outside the Bernie Sanders rally at St. Mary's Park - Bronx, NY - 3-31-16

New York’s late spot on the election calendar almost always means the two main party’s presidential nominees are a done deal by the time we get to vote in the primary.

This year is a little different obviously.

The scramble for committed delegates is a lock to be hot on both sides in the run-up to NY’s April 19 primaries.

What’s nice about it if you follow politics is that the candidates will actually spend time here trying to win votes the old fashioned way rather than simply swooping in and out for campaign cash.

Bernie kicked off his New York campaign with an event at a public park in the South Bronx Thursday night. I went over there after I got off work at 215 PM.

The Sanders campaign had alerted supporters of the gathering via e-mail two days earlier. They asked for a RSVP but offered few details about the event’s logistics other than the fact they would start letting people in at 4 PM.

When I arrived in Mott Haven about 3 PM, the western perimeter of St. Mary’s Park was cordoned off with a combination of plastic tape and physical barricades with access blocked by uniformed NYPD. It was unclear from the campaign’s e-mail where the entrance to the event was. Based on movement of people wearing Sanders stuff, it became clear the south border of the park was where the action was.

It was very chaotic at the intersection of St. Mary’s and Cypress where it appeared they were setting up to let people in. A little to the west at Beekman, a long line of media were going into a separate entrance.

I could have easily blended into the scrum at Cypress and walked in when they started admitting people at about 4 PM, but then it became clear a line had formed. It stretched for as far as the eye could see up the eastern border of the park. There was no visible attempt by the campaign to administer or implement a plan to process this huge crowd so most of these thousands of people who were already there seemed to take it upon themselves to create a queue, however imperfect it turned out to be.

So, I walked and walked until I found the end of the line up near 147th St. and hoped for the best. It was 330 PM at that point. A little after 4 PM, the line started to creep but then a second impromptu line containing latecomers appeared to thwart orderliness.

the line to enter the Bernie Sanders rally went up Jackson Avenue for as far as the eye could see - Bronx, NY - 3-31-16

NYPD appeared only interested in keeping people off the street – not at all concerned about the logistics of the big line and whether there was a fairness to it. And because this was a massive gathering of the true political left, there wasn’t any kind of bickering or dissent about how this was all playing out.

At about the three hour mark waiting in line, I had almost reached the entrance. I was so close. But it was there that the NYPD said the “park was full” and that we would be siphoned off into a ball field to watch the rally on a video screen.

The ball field we flowed into had just been aerated so it was kind of messy. The video screen was big but the audio was hard to hear. It was 630 PM at that point. A rep from the Sanders campaign came to the podium in the main gathering spot (which we saw via video) and said the “program” would start in one hour. Even before Bernie would speak, there would be oration from a musician (Residente), an actor (Rosario Dawson) and a film director (Spike Lee).

I’ve seen Bernie’s stump speech a hundred times and so I didn’t feel like standing in a ball field watching a video screen in the dark. Had I made it into the actual rally, I would have stayed for sure. But I wasn’t feeling it in the ball field. I walked up to 149th and got on the train at Third Avenue.

I watched the full tape of the “program” the next day. Bernie actually didn’t alter or customize his speech much for the NYC audience. Dawson was pretty awesome and is a clear asset to the campaign. She’s almost alarmingly abrasive in her criticism of Hillary but why not state the obvious and allow the surrogate to do what the candidate has been pretty reluctant to do.

The media seemed to coalesce around a crowd estimate number of 18,500. I’d say if anything, it was higher. Impressive for sure. Clinton could never dream of assembling an audience of that size and energy level at this stage of the campaign. While the crowd at St. Mary’s Park tilted white, it was anything but a homogeneous collection of people. I had a lump in my throat as I stood there in line seeing the wonderful diversity in a crowd that had given up half their day to feel the Bern.

I guess the question for the Sanders campaign is whether they can convert the clear passion here for his ideas into a NY primary result that allows him to make the case he can somehow snatch the nomination away from the long-presumed winner. He’s down 12 points in the latest poll in NY which he can easily eat into in the next two weeks. What he needs is a clear-cut 55-percent or above-type outcome. There is no actual “win” from a simple 51-49 result given the proportionate delegate split. So, he needs a tidal wave. Something that puts ants in the pants of the so-called superdelegates who are nothing more than math-padding establishment yes-men (and women).

The mayor here – Bill deBlasio – is in a totally weird place as this all plays out. He has publicly endorsed Clinton after a long delay but shows no authentic zeal for her campaign – and vice-versa. When deBlaz and his wife went to Iowa in the days before the caucuses, the Clinton campaign wanted nothing to do with the coordination of their activities. DeBlasio’s politics mesh way more closely with Bernie’s. But like deBlaz’s betrayal of Zephyr Teachout during her primary run against Andy Cuomo, the Mayor makes these ham-handed alliances that seem to favor the “don’t bite hand that feeds” concept over one’s very pure and popular ideals.

I’ve come to terms with the idea the nomination is stacked in favor of Hillary but hope Bernie’s success in Wisconsin, New York, the state of Washington and hopefully California can move her to the left. In the end, Hillary will be Hillary I guess. But at some point, these little hints of revolution that you saw in Mott Haven on Thursday offer some hope the “bought-off, more-of-the-same” model is losing its luster.

Walked out of work at the airport Tuesday and saw a Port Authority policeman carrying a long military grade weapon. He was alone, eyeing people as they came and went just outside entrances to the lower level of the Central Terminal Building. The policeman quizzed a few guys who caught his eye and then moved on along the perimeter of the building.

He looked more soldier than cop.

It was the same M-O at the 34th Street / Herald Square subway station in Manhattan this morning – and even here in the Heights at the busy 74th and Rosie station. These guys were all NYPD. They were impossible to miss and they too had special weapons that look much more fierce than what you’d normally see from the city’s law enforcement.

This is probably as far as government will go to bolster existing visible security measures at the New York City airports and in the subway system. You put guys with big guns in places where people who use those facilities can see them. Show the bad guys some muscle and firepower.

Beyond that, it gets cumbersome or impractical, doesn’t it for those who like freedom of movement in a place already so densely packed and tough to move about? I had a co-worker suggest Tuesday that perhaps only ticketed customers should be allowed to enter the airport terminal building. Not sure whether the tradeoff on such policy is beneficial. Pushing out a target’s boundaries brings a lot of people associated with the target right out there with the new dividing line.

The former journalist and FBI flack John Miler appeared with Scott Pelley Tuesday night to discuss Brussels. Miller went out of his way to object to the public’s access to readily-available encrypted chat applications. Miller is Bill Bratton’s right-hand man on terror and intelligence for NYC and has always seemed like a sharp, reasonable guy.

Should the citizenry have guarantees against government snooping on communication via cell phone through third-party apps? I would argue yes but the debate turns more difficult on days when attacks are planned and executed via technology so easy to obtain. Miller is worried about this technology.

I was surprised how slow the news coverage of Brussels moved as the day went on. I was checking dozens of news organizations in the US, UK and France throughout and watched the expanded network newscast on CBS.

Almost every newspaper I checked spotlighted and relied on what is now becoming a famous photograph taken by Ketevan Kardava, a Georgian broadcast journalist based in Brussels who just happened to be at the airport when the bombs went off. It’s a compelling shot but it seemed to be the default choice of almost all the news outlets to illustrate what happened. The picture shows a flight attendant from India sitting in a chair, covered in soot with blood dripping from her forehead. Her top appears to have been partially blasted off, exposing her undergarment. She’s wearing a left shoe but she’s barefoot on the right. She appears badly dazed. Another woman seated to her right is speaking urgently on a cell phone with blood running down from the hand holding the phone. She appears OK otherwise and has a composed look but is not paying attention to the woman in distress. The photo invites so many questions. Is the woman on the phone calling for help? Is she speaking to a loved one? Does she know the flight attendant.

The New York Times placed the Kardava photo prominently and with good size on top of the fold under the headline: BRUSSELS ATTACKS SHAKE EUROPEAN SECURITY.

The Daily News used the same photo on its front page but made the mistake of cropping out the woman on the phone. Newsday went with the blurry surveillance video screenshot of the three men at the airport connected to the bombings. The Telegraph yesterday reported that law enforcement did not want that photo disseminated immediately but agreed to confirm its legitimacy after it was leaked.

Also curious in the early phase of the coverage were numerous reports that one of the bombs had been set off in the vicinity of the American Airlines check-in counter. A few hours passed with that specific detail being widely reported before American asserted strongly that all their people were OK and that the cited blast did not originate near where they do business. A little before 10 AM in the East, American put out a news release to debunk the bad info – saying in part: “American Airlines check-in operates out of row 8 of the departure hall, and the explosions did not occur at row 8.”

The Times says that there was a blast at row 3 of the main departure hall which is arranged in an unusual rectangular space unlike any check-in space I could compare it to. The nearest US-based carrier to row 3 is United (at row 6) but that company also declared early yesterday that all of its people were safe and accounted for.

Among the airlines that check-in customers at row 3 are Lufthansa, Austrian and Turkish although you’d assume those with the most exposure to the blast’s flying debris may be people waiting in line at row 2.