West Virginia’s five electoral votes won’t be in play for President Obama this November but his campaign has to be somewhat aggravated by how that state’s democratic party primary turned out last Tuesday.

Of the nearly 180-thousand presidential primary votes cast, an astounding 72,544 were marked for Keith Judd.  Obama received the balance (105,854 votes).  Unopposed in most states, Obama is a cinch to recapture his party’s nomination.  The outcome in West Virginia won’t impact his campaign’s strategy to gather 270-plus electoral college votes in the slightest.

But the extreme outlandishness of what happened in West Virginia cannot be understated.  Judd might as well be Daffy Duck for the purposes of categorizing him as a candidate.  He’s nuts.  He has zero credentials for the job and he’ll be incarcerated in Texas for the entirety of the term he‘s seeking.  Judd shouldn’t be anywhere near a presidential primary ballot – especially when serious, law-abiding public servants seeking lower-ranking offices are denied ballot access all over this country all the time.

I’m all for greater choice in the voting booth but Judd’s performance in West Virginia reflects badly on that state’s notoriously crooked Democratic Party machinery and the loyalists it turns out for elections.

Lawmakers there can start by refining state election law to raise the bar on access to the Presidential primary ballot.  While the US constitution put limits on what states can do in this regard, there has to be a way to keep a guy like Judd from making a joke of the process.  From Texarkana, TX, Judd mailed off three money orders (likely with help from a trickster) totaling $2500 and a notarized, completed form to gain his spot on WV’s ballot.  Only the names of Judd and Obama appeared on WV’s democratic party ballot under the choice for president.  For $2500, you’d think more people would take a crack at it.

West Virginia’s junior senator Joe Manchin and current governor Earl Ray Tomblin are both democrats but both refuse to endorse Obama.  Manchin wouldn’t even reveal who he voted for in the Obama/Judd matchup.

Judd won 41-percent of the vote state-wide.  He won coal-rich Mingo County by a margin of 2972 to 1967.  He won ten counties across the state.  Even in Raleigh County where there’s some degree of scrutiny and structure, Judd garnered nearly half the 6500 or so votes cast.

Obama’s clean energy push (as modest as it may be) scares many in West Virginia.  Coal is king there.  But the droves who cast a protest vote for a convicted sap look foolish for the choice made.  So do the party power brokers who got a little too cute for their own good when they facilitated the outcome they ended up with.

-Congrats to Dan Lynch for hitting the five-year mark with his great web site NYCTaper.  A week after recording the Woods/Crystal Stilts show at 285 Kent, Lynch is celebrating NYCTaper’s anniversary at the same venue tonight.  Oneida will top the special bill.  Among the hundreds of shows recorded and made available for download on Lynch’s site the last five years are 11 Oneida gigs.  Lynch and a small team of helpers record many of New York City’s important music performances and later present them to the public in full form with a brief review and set list.  Said Lynch on NYCTaper:  “It’s a humbling experience to realize that our hard work and good intentions have made this site work for a community of music performers and music lovers.  We hope to keep doing this and to continue to grow into the future.”

New York City’s ambitious bike share system is on schedule to launch in July and we’re now learning a few important details about user costs.

For those who live here eager to use the program it’ll cost you 95 bucks for an annual membership.  The pricing scheme recently unveiled tilts pretty favorably in favor of those who buy the one-year plan.

Pay the up-front fee and you’re basically good to go with a crack at the ten-thousand two-wheelers that’ll be stationed across Manhattan and Brooklyn at 600 different racks.  Those with the annual deal will have 45 minutes on a bike pulled from a depot before it’s due back in a rack.  Any rack.  Bikes that aren’t returned on time will result in overdue charges that get pretty stiff depending on the length of the lateness.

Visitors can buy one-day ($9.95) or seven-day ($25) access but will be limited to just 30 minute rides before their bike is due back in a rack.  The 30-minute limit seems a bit short and will inevitably trigger overage costs for those who aren’t adept at meeting the constraint.

I personally gave up ownership of a bike about eight years ago when I moved to the small apartment I live in now.  Not only would a bike eat up valuable space in my place but my neighborhood is so densely populated, it would be hard to launch a safe ride from where I’m at.

What bike share does for me is big.  It’ll allow me to initiate rides in places and at times where interaction with automobiles will be slim or none.  I’ll jump on a bike at the lower end of Central Park or along one of the rivers early on an off day.  I’ll pedal on a trail that doesn’t allow cars and return it to a rack 40 minutes later and swap it for another one to reset the clock.  I’ll return bike #2 at a dock near the subway and come home happy.  Eventually, I imagine I’ll find a route and a routine that works.  If I do it with any kind of regularity, the 95 bucks is a deal.

The location of racks in parts of Manhattan already saturated with obstructions will likely spur complaints.  I envision backlash.  But I believe bike share is gonna be a positive development for a guy like me who has gotten away from urban biking because of hyper-anxiety about getting hit by a car (not to mention the storage issue).

I’ll pick my spots.  I’ll grab a bike and go for a ride.  The cost of a one-year pass comes in well under the charge for a monthly unlimited Metrocard.  If all goes well with the initial deployment of ten-thousand bikes, the city is saying it will expand further into the outer boroughs.   I like it.  I look forward to it.